Skip to content
CosmoExchange

The Lowest-Rated Titles of This Year, Based on Metacritic

At every turn, gamers are foaming at the mouth to post their selections of the greatest releases of 2025. However, what of the flops, the underperformers? We'll take a momentary detour to honor the absolute worst games of the year, according to review aggregator Metacritic. Is every one of these games as bad as the reviews suggest? Let's find out.

10. Switch 2's Welcome Tour

Aggregate Score: 54/100, User Score: 3.4/10

Initial reactions to this tech demo were shaped by its $9.99 price tag, with many feeling cheesed off it wasn't a free pack-in like competing console launches. Critical opinion varied dramatically, from harsh disappointment to more generous reviews that highlighted the charming software underneath the controversy. Regardless of the grumbling, the title proved to be a notable seller during its launch month.

9. Rennsport

Aggregate Score: 53/100, Audience Score: 3.2/10

Billed as "beyond a racing game," this simulation from European developers garnered largely negative reviews. Critics noted that the game was lacking in almost every category, particularly in a year packed with high-quality racing titles. In the eyes of critics, this underwhelming entry was best left in the garage.

8. Bubsy in: The Purrfect Collection

Aggregate Score: 53/100, Audience Score: 8.6/10

Before we start: the awkward colon usage is a minor point of contention. This compilation of SNES and PS1 platforming games showcases a sarcastic feline known for non-stop jokes. Critics observed that these games were mediocre originally and have not improved with age. The notably positive user score is a baffling oddity to the critical reception.

7. Hunter x Hunter: Nen x Impact

Aggregate Score: 53, User Score: 3.5

This *Hunter x Hunter* fighter faced harsh criticism from both reviewers and the dedicated community. Complaints centered on a thin character selection and a minimal offering of content. User reviews was notably harsh, with some stating a wish that the title's flop would be a warning for future projects.

6. Riders Vs Dogoos

Metascore: 51, Audience Score: 5.3

Hailing from the niche Hyperdimension Neptunia series, this vehicle combat game tasks players with gathering slime-like creatures. The assessment was that its goal to recreate a unique gameplay loop ultimately fell flat, coming across as more of a quick spin-off than a substantial addition to the franchise. Its 3-hour duration combined with a $40 price tag seemed like a bold choice.

5. Captain Blood

Aggregate Score: 50, Audience Score: 5.3

This title is a curious artifact from the past, seeing the light of day after nearly two decades in development hell. The developers consciously chose to preserve the game as an authentic experience of its time, acknowledging that modern gamers might not appreciate its dated design. As such, many reviews concluded that the interesting history of its journey was more interesting than the end product.

4. Scar-Lead

Metascore: 44, User Score: 2.4

This anime-styled action game drawing from games like *Returnal* disappointed with critics. Frequent criticisms centered on repetitive adversaries, repetitive levels, and a snoozy narrative. A controversial mechanic involving the protagonist's clothing was widely panned and undermined the game's overall experience.

3. Paramedic Simulator

Metascore: 44, User Score: 4.9

Recall the tense surgery games of the past, then remove the memorable characters. That, according to reviews, is essentially *Ambulance Life*. Players found the core gameplay loop to be monotonous, and the treatment of mental health topics was criticized as being poorly executed. The overall experience was deemed largely unsatisfying.

2. Tamagotchi Plaza

Aggregate Score: 43, Audience Score: 5.8

This new direction for the classic virtual pet formula makes the franchise into a minigame collection title. The result, per critics, was a dull assortment of simple minigames that very soon became boring. Some reviews went so far as to call it one of the worst titles available on its platform, pointing to a profound lack of engaging content.

1. MindsEye

Aggregate Score: 37, Audience Score: 2.5

Positioned as a major open-world action game from a team featuring well-known figures, *MindsEye* was a notable critical flop. Reviews heavily criticized its weak action, dull missions, and a plethora of technical problems. Critics found it to be a regression compared to much older games in the action genre. Despite the overwhelming criticism, a few of fans found fun in the experience, providing a lonely contrast.

AA
The writer

Anthony Ayers

An astrophysicist and science communicator passionate about making space exploration accessible to all.

CosmoExchange

Type to search articles.